DIAL response: break repeated closer formulas and citation-stacking

[rogerSuperBuilderAlpha]

Summary

• User feedback: the prose read as mechanically generated. Every Results subsection (8/8) and 4 of 5 Discussion themes closed on the identical "Thus [Type] is [Category]: [epigram]" formula; several passages stacked citations in flat parenthetical-final lists; "coded for act" and "That is X" repeated as unvaried launchers throughout.
• Built a drafting register from 9 same-issue 2027 IJHCS articles (including Belousov et al. itself) to calibrate against the actual target venue's prose patterns rather than guessing, confirmed their subsection closers vary constantly and never repeat a formula.
• Rewrote every flagged passage: 12 closers now end differently from each other, 6 sentences that ended cold on a citation parenthesis now put the author in subject position, the Conclusion's six-citation paragraph is split and rebalanced, "coded for act" (5→0) and "That is X" (8→3, no longer clustered) are broken up.
• Also reapplies the Discussion theme rebuild and literature-integration pass from earlier this session, after a save from outside this session corrupted the file's markdown structure (headers/tables/bold stripped) and introduced text-level garbling. That corrupted save was discarded, not built on.
• (Replaces DIAL response: break repeated closer formulas and citation-stacking #766, which reported false conflicts from a squash-merge history divergence — this branch is built directly off contrib's current tip.)

Test plan

• Zero remaining "Thus " sentence openers (grep-verified)
• Zero remaining sentence-final citation parentheses (grep-verified)
• Markdown structure (headers, tables, code fences, bold) intact (spot-checked)
• Human read-aloud pass

🤖 Generated with Claude Code