Skip to content

Promote contrib to main: DIAL response prose-quality pass - #768

Merged
rogerSuperBuilderAlpha merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
contrib
Sep 22, 2026
Merged

rogerSuperBuilderAlpha merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
contrib

Conversation

@rogerSuperBuilderAlpha

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Promotes the merged contrib work to main: breaking the repeated "Thus X is Y" closer formula and citation-stacking flagged in the DIAL response draft's prose, from PR #767.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…ng in DIAL response prose (#767)

The user flagged the prose as reading mechanically generated: nearly every
Results subsection (8/8) and 4 of 5 Discussion themes closed on an identical
"Thus [Type] is [Category]: [epigram]" formula, several passages stacked
citations in flat parenthetical-final lists, and "coded for act" / "That is
X" launchers repeated as tics throughout.

Built a drafting register (registers/ijhcs/ in the draft skill, outside this
repo) from 9 same-issue 2027 IJHCS articles including Belousov et al. itself,
confirmed directly from their text that subsection closers vary constantly
and never repeat a formula, then rewrote every flagged passage: 12 closers
now end differently from each other, 6 sentences that ended cold on a
citation parenthesis now put the author in subject position instead, the
Conclusion's six-citation paragraph is split and rebalanced, and "coded for
act" (5 occurrences) and "That is X" (8 occurrences) are mostly varied away.

This also reapplies the corpus-reframe-era Discussion theme rebuild and
literature-integration pass from earlier this session (new Theme 3 on
programmable pleasure, self-as-node relocated to Theme 5, ~40 citations
woven into the prose, References list updated) after a save from outside
this session corrupted the file's markdown structure and introduced text-
level garbling; that corrupted save was discarded rather than built on.

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@rogerSuperBuilderAlpha
rogerSuperBuilderAlpha merged commit 8afeda6 into main Sep 22, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant