Skip to content

fix: make identifier publication release-owned - #7

Merged
jeremi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/636-release-owned-publication
Sep 19, 2026
Merged

jeremi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/636-release-owned-publication

Conversation

@jeremi

@jeremi jeremi commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • restore the exact v0.32.0 source catalog, including all Casework identifiers
  • preserve 178 previously published identifiers as deprecated and retain every historical digest artifact
  • deploy only a reviewed publisher bundle that matches an exact Registry Stack release tag, source commit, and catalog digest
  • add exact-byte smoke coverage for all 296 identifiers and 24 immutable artifacts

Dependency

Companion publisher change for registrystack/registry-stack#636. The Registry Stack release workflow PR will dispatch this workflow and wait for its correlated deployment.

Pinned release source: 22ea92286036f28a59cfbe5d7c835f4738d62074 (v0.32.0)
Catalog SHA-256: 2be0b75f9d9e56451af9785fbf73284806f40ab70bf2a1c85f3a612d871510d1

Verification

  • npm test
  • npm run check:upstream -- <v0.32.0 checkout>
  • actionlint .github/workflows/*.yml
  • local smoke:catalog: 296 identifiers and 24 retained immutable artifacts
  • local smoke:live
  • independent blocker-only review: clean

Signed-off-by: Jeremi Joslin <jeremi@joslin.fr>
@jeremi
jeremi marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2026 18:27
@jeremi
jeremi merged commit 861b6a5 into main Sep 19, 2026
1 check passed
@jeremi
jeremi deleted the codex/636-release-owned-publication branch September 19, 2026 18:27

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f41901c3c6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

push:
branches: [main]
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Restrict production deployments to the main branch

When this workflow is dispatched with a non-main ref, the checkout and subsequent build use the publisher files from that ref, but no condition verifies github.ref. Because workflow_dispatch permits selecting a branch, a write-capable caller can deploy an unreviewed feature-branch bundle with the production Cloudflare credentials despite the new reviewed-main publication model; reject any ref other than refs/heads/main before the deploy job runs.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment thread .github/workflows/ci.yml
python3 -m http.server 8765 --directory public >"${RUNNER_TEMP}/identifier-server.log" 2>&1 &
server_pid="$!"
trap 'kill "${server_pid}"' EXIT
IDENTIFIER_BASE_URL=http://127.0.0.1:8765 npm run smoke:catalog

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Wait for the local server before starting the catalog smoke

When Python has not finished binding port 8765 before this newly added command starts, smoke:catalog immediately launches eight workers and permanently records their connection failures instead of retrying. This is reproducible with the workflow's command sequence—the smoke reported 68 of 320 failed requests while the server became ready during the run—so otherwise valid CI runs can fail; poll a known route or add retry handling before starting the smoke.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-19T18:31:17.313182Z f41901c Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant