chore: capture the findings from the itd-150..162 implementation run - #556
Merged
Conversation
Seven records the orchestration hit and had not yet written down, including the spec-close gap that leaves twelve delivered intents out of the next derived changelog. Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5[1m]
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Seven findings from the itd-150..162 implementation run that were not captured
during it. Six others were captured in flight by the implementing agents and by
the integration review; these are the ones the orchestration itself hit, plus
one gap the run exposed by leaving it open.
git pushcan report success while pushing nothing, when the pre-push preflight outlasts the SSH idle timeout.capturerefuses a closed-set flag value without naming the flag or the accepted set.The first is the load-bearing entry. Twelve specifications are open and twelve
intents still planned while the code realising them is on main, and nothing
detects that shape. Because the changelog is derived from the shipped-intent and
resolved-issue folders, a release cut taken now would announce the resolved
issues and omit every intent the release actually delivers.
Checked against the existing ledger before capture: none of the seven duplicates
a record. The attribution one is deliberately distinct from iss-211, which is
about making the preference portable, and iss-220, which is about composing the
trailer at creation time. This one is about a trailer that is present,
well-formed, and wrong.
Records only. No behaviour changes.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5[1m]