Version Packages

[github-actions]

This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.

Releases

@seamless-auth/react@0.10.0

Minor Changes

• 17a657d: Let a caller choose where a magic link lands.

  requestMagicLink takes an optional redirectUri. A deployment serving both a web
  app and a mobile app previously had one destination for every magic link, so a link
  had to arrive in one or the other.

  The value goes in the request body the client already sends. The deployment validates
  it against its configured origins and refuses anything else, so this cannot be used to
  point a link on the tenant's domain somewhere it should not go, and a refusal comes
  back as an ordinary error result.

  Omit it and nothing changes: the same empty body is sent, so the destination stays the
  deployment's own and no caller has to do anything.

  Needs a @seamless-auth/server adapter that forwards the field and an auth API that
  understands it. Against older versions the value is dropped and the link keeps the
  deployment's destination, which is the behaviour today.

• 4199d52: Add getPasskeyPolicyErrorCode(), which reads the code a refused passkey
  registration carries (attachment_not_allowed, synced_passkey_not_allowed,
  authenticator_not_allowed, or prf_required) so an app can explain the
  refusal instead of rendering the raw code from error.message. Unrecognized
  codes return undefined, so a refusal from a newer API keeps your generic
  messaging.

  The PasskeyPolicyErrorCode union is derived from WebAuthnErrorCode in
  @seamless-auth/types, so the codes this recognizes cannot drift from the ones
  the API sends.

  This matters on a default deployment: the API's
  authenticator_policy.syncedPasskeys defaults to block, and passkeys created
  by iCloud Keychain or Google Password Manager are backup eligible, so the most
  common consumer passkey is refused at registration.

• 8690cb0: Drop the naming step from the bundled passkey enrolment view.

  Choosing "Register Passkey" (or "Use a security key instead") opened a modal asking for a
  friendly name, and the browser's own passkey prompt only appeared once that form was
  submitted. A user who came to the screen to press one button was handed a text field
  first, at the point in the flow where they had the least idea what to type.

  Registration now starts on the click. The credential still carries a friendlyName, and
  the view fills it with the device the passkey was enrolled on (mac • chrome), which is
  what the naming prompt suggested people write anyway. Renaming stays available through
  updateCredential.

  Nothing in the public API moves: PasskeyMetadata.friendlyName is unchanged and callers
  building their own enrolment screen keep setting it themselves. Only the bundled
  /register-passkey view changes, so an adopter relying on that screen to collect a name
  needs their own screen for it.

• fa27861: registerPasskey() accepts an attachment, so a caller can ask for a roaming
  authenticator (cross-platform, a USB or NFC security key) or the one built
  into the device (platform) instead of leaving the choice to the browser's
  picker. The bundled enrolment view offers a "Use a security key instead" control
  that takes this path, and explains a policy refusal rather than showing a
  generic failure.

  Omitting the option sends no query parameter, so the deployment's
  authenticator_policy.attachment stays in charge and current behaviour is
  unchanged. It is a request rather than an override: a deployment that pins the
  other kind refuses the registration with attachment_not_allowed, which
  getPasskeyPolicyErrorCode() reads.

  PasskeyAttachment is exported, and is derived from the deployment policy type
  in @seamless-auth/types rather than restating its members.