Skip to content

docs: correct Args section in UiPathExecutionRuntime.stream docstring - #166

Open
Avicennasis wants to merge 1 commit into
UiPath:mainfrom
Avicennasis:docs/fix-typos
Open

docs: correct Args section in UiPathExecutionRuntime.stream docstring#166
Avicennasis wants to merge 1 commit into
UiPath:mainfrom
Avicennasis:docs/fix-typos

Conversation

@Avicennasis

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Fix 1 copy-paste error in a docstring:

  • src/uipath/runtime/base.py: the Args: section of UiPathExecutionRuntime.stream() documented runtime and context, neither of which is a parameter of the method. The actual signature is stream(self, input: dict[str, Any] | None = None, options: UiPathStreamOptions | None = None), so the section now documents input and options.

The options description mirrors the UiPathStreamOptions class docstring ("Streaming-specific execution options").

No functional changes - docstring only. No identifiers were renamed.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 6, 2026 09:12
@Avicennasis
Avicennasis requested review from a team and cristipufu as code owners September 6, 2026 09:12

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The change is a straightforward docstring correction that matches the method signature and introduces no functional or API changes.

Pull request overview

This PR corrects the Args: section of the UiPathExecutionRuntime.stream() docstring so it matches the method’s actual signature in the runtime SDK.

Changes:

  • Replaced incorrect runtime / context parameters in the docstring with input / options.
  • Aligned the options description with the UiPathStreamOptions docstring (“Streaming-specific execution options”).
File summaries
File Description
src/uipath/runtime/base.py Fixes UiPathExecutionRuntime.stream() docstring parameter documentation to match the real method signature.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants